Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4vsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTwin-turboSUV2018-2021
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,078 km
    670 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,921kg4,235lb
1,556kg3,430lb
Gross weight-
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
91.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
84.0s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
9.2s
0-200 km/h
70.6s
Calculated
70.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,078km670mi
Calculated
857km533mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
505L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
48L
CO2 emissions
135g/km
128g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,740-2,520 rpm5,000 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
9.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
70.6 s
70.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,921 kg
4,235 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,556 kg
3,430 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X9.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,078 km
670 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
857 km
533 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.8 s
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
9.2 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
9.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
9.2 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,921 kg
4,235 lb
1,556 kg
3,430 lb
Fuel consumption
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,078 km
670 mi
857 km
533 mi
CO2 score
135 g/km
128 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
99 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.1 kg/hp
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 176 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 221 km (138 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 75 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Is 365 kg lighter
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 7 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 D4
20d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 D4
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 D4
40 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 D4
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster