Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 BiturbovsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Highest torque383 Nm282 lb-ft
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Best power-to-weight222 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful287 hp214 kW
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 287hp214kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 362Nm267lb-ft | 383Nm282lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Gross weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 39.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo has 7 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 and Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 5.9 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 4.9 s |
Although Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 and Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 287 hp 214 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
- Has 21 Nm more
- Is 285 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























