Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 BiturbovsMaserati Quattroporte III 4.9
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Quattroporte III
4.9
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful287 hp214 kW
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score79/100
Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9
- Highest torque393 Nm290 lb-ft
- Largest trunk600 L
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 287hp214kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 362Nm267lb-ft | 393Nm290lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Gross weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | 2,325kg5,126lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 23.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 4,930cc301cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,980mm196in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,525mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 600L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: Power / Torque
- Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 5,600 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 23.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo has 7 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9 and Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 5.9 s |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo and Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo and Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9: 9.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 280 hp 209 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 |
| 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 287 hp 214 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 600 L 21.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo | Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 19.5 L/100 km12.1 mpg US14.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 34.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 54.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 2,925 L773 US gal643 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 5,119 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 355 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 9.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9
- Has 31 Nm more
- Has 180 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























