Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 BiturbovsHSV Caprice 5.7 215i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHSV Caprice
5.7 215i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score79/100
HSV Caprice 5.7 215i
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Largest trunk443 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | HSVCaprice5.7 215i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 287hp214kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 362Nm267lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,632kg3,598lb |
| Gross weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 67.3s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 615km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 5,733cc350cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,989mm196in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,794mm71in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,479mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,826mm111in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,491mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,491mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 443L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 83L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: Power / Torque
- HSV Caprice 5.7 215i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 4,800 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | HSVCaprice5.7 215i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 292 hp 218 kW |
HSV Caprice 5.7 215i has 5 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo and HSV Caprice 5.7 215i: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 1,632 kg 3,598 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 5.9 s |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 6.9 s |
Although HSV Caprice 5.7 215i has more power, Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo and HSV Caprice 5.7 215i: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo and HSV Caprice 5.7 215i: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 769 km 478 mi |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 615 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.9 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i |
| 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| HSVCaprice5.7 215i | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | HSVCaprice5.7 215i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 287 hp 214 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,632 kg 3,598 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 615 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 443 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo | HSV Caprice 5.7 215i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 23.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 38.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 3,544 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Is 87 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 154 km (96 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
HSV Caprice 5.7 215i
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 113 Nm more
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























