Maserati Quattroporte III
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9vsBMW 7 Series (E23) · Facelift 1983 745i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 7 Series (E23) · Facelift 1983
745i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque393 Nm290 lb-ft
- Largest trunk600 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score79/100
BMW 7 Series (E23) Facelift 1983 745i
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 393Nm290lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 2,325kg5,126lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 75.3s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.5s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 847km527mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,930cc301cu in | 3,430cc209cu in |
| Length | 4,980mm196in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,350mm53in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,502mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,524mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 132mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 600L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9: Power / Torque
- BMW 7 Series (E23) Facelift 1983 745i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 5,600 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 4,900 rpm | 2,200 rpm | 5,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.5 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 252 hp 188 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9 has 28 hp more than BMW 7 Series (E23) Facelift 1983 745i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 7 Series (E23) Facelift 1983 745i and Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 7.0 s |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9 and BMW 7 Series (E23) Facelift 1983 745i: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 7 Series (E23) Facelift 1983 745i and Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9: 7.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 280 hp 209 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 252 hp 188 kW | 7.9 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 |
| 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 7 Series (E23) Facelift 1983 745i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte III4.9 | BMW7 Series (E23)Facelift 1983745i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 19.5 L/100 km 12.1 mpg US 14.5 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 847 km 527 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 600 L 21.2 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9 | BMW 7 Series (E23) Facelift 1983 745i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 19.5 L/100 km12.1 mpg US14.5 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 34.13 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 54.92 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,925 L773 US gal643 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,119 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte III 4.9
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 13 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW 7 Series (E23) Facelift 1983 745i
- Is 310 kg lighter
- Uses 7.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























