Maserati Shamal
Car comparison
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32VvsMaserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati 228
2.8 i V6 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Highest torque436 Nm322 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score76/100
Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo
- Lightest1,240 kg2,734 lb
- Lowest city consumption18.2 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326hp243kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 436Nm322lb-ft | 373Nm275lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,417kg3,124lb | 1,240kg2,734lb |
| Gross weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 68.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 24.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 202hp/t150kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | 695km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 2,790cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,100mm161in | 4,460mm176in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,330mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,512mm60in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,550mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 530L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 24.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW |
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V has 76 hp more than Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo and Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: 76 hp (57 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V and Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 696 km 432 mi |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 695 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW | 5.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Maserati2282.8 i V6 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp 243 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | 695 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V | Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Has 76 hp more
- Has 63 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1 km (0 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Maserati 228 2.8 i V6 Turbo
- Is 177 kg lighter
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























