Lynk & Co Z10
95 kWh
789 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2024-present
Car comparison
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWhvsPolestar 5 112 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Polestar 5
112 kWh
748 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2025-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful789 hp588 kW
- Lightest2,468 kg5,441 lb
- Best power-to-weight320 hp/t238 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk616 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Highest torque812 Nm599 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Polestar5112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 789hp588kW | 748hp558kW |
| Torque | 810Nm597lb-ft | 812Nm599lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,468kg5,441lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Gross weight | 2,888kg6,367lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 28.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 34.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.6s Calculated | 11.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 320hp/t238kW/t145hp/1000 lb Calculated | 299hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,028mm198in | 5,087mm200in |
| Width | 1,966mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,005mm118in | 3,054mm120in |
| Front track | 1,698mm67in | 1,716mm68in |
| Rear track | 1,710mm67in | 1,684mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 142mm6in | 149mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 616L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,128L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Polestar5112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.6 s | 11.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 128 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 789 hp 588 kW |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 748 hp 558 kW |
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has 41 hp more than Polestar 5 112 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Polestar 5 112 kWh and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 810 Nm 597 lb-ft |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 812 Nm 599 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 2,468 kg 5,441 lb |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Polestar5112 kWh | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 3.5 s |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 320 hp/t 238 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 789 hp 588 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 748 hp 558 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Polestar5112 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Polestar5112 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 789 hp 588 kW | 748 hp 558 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 810 Nm 597 lb-ft | 812 Nm 599 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,468 kg 5,441 lb | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 320 hp/t 238 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Has 41 hp more
- Is 32 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 251 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Has 2 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Polestar 5 112 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsPolestar5112 kWh
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)Facelift 2026S 680 V8
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020Competition 4.4 V8
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)S 680 V12
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80 LCI)Facelift 2024Competition 3.0
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)Facelift 2026S 580 V8
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMW7 Series (G70)760i
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0