Car comparison

BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8vsLynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

Lynk & Co Z10

95 kWh

789 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,865 kg
    4,112 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    335 hp/t
    250 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

  • Most powerful
    789 hp
    588 kW
  • Highest torque
    810 Nm
    597 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    616 L
  • Best practicality score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
625hp466kW
789hp588kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
810Nm597lb-ft
Curb weight
1,865kg4,112lb
2,468kg5,441lb
Gross weight
2,440kg5,379lb
2,888kg6,367lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
39.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
28.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.3s
3.5s
0-200 km/h
10.8s
9.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.1s
Calculated
3.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.2s
Calculated
11.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
335hp/t250kW/t152hp/1000 lb
Calculated
320hp/t238kW/t145hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
402Nm/t269lb-ft/ton
Calculated
328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
630km391mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
-
Length
4,966mm196in
5,028mm198in
Width
1,903mm75in
1,966mm77in
Height
1,469mm58in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,982mm117in
3,005mm118in
Front track
1,625mm64in
1,698mm67in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,710mm67in
Ground clearance
128mm5in
142mm6in
Trunk volume
530L
616L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
-
CO2 emissions
246g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.1 s
3.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.3 s
3.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.8 s
9.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
4.8 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
7.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.4 s
9.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.2 s
11.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
214 km/h
133 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
625 hp
466 kW
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
789 hp
588 kW

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has 164 hp more than BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 164 hp (122 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
810 Nm
597 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
1,865 kg
4,112 lb
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
2,468 kg
5,441 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V83.3 s
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh3.5 s

Although Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has more power, BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
335 hp/t
250 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
320 hp/t
238 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
625 hp
466 kW
3.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
789 hp
588 kW
3.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
Power
625 hp
466 kW
0-100 km/h3.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
789 hp
588 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
625 hp
466 kW
789 hp
588 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
810 Nm
597 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.3 s
3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,865 kg
4,112 lb
2,468 kg
5,441 lb
Fuel consumption
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
630 km
391 mi
-
CO2 score
246 g/km
-
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
335 hp/t
250 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
320 hp/t
238 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8
Consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.42 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,835 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8

  • Is 603 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

  • Has 164 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Has 86 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8 vs Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster