Polestar 5
112 kWh
884 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2025-present
Car comparison
Polestar 5 112 kWhvsLynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Lynk & Co Z10
95 kWh
789 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2024-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful884 hp659 kW
- Highest torque1,015 Nm749 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight353 hp/t263 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score0/100
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Lightest2,468 kg5,441 lb
- Largest trunk616 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Polestar5112 kWh | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 884hp659kW | 789hp588kW |
| Torque | 1,015Nm749lb-ft | 810Nm597lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,503kg5,518lb | 2,468kg5,441lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,888kg6,367lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 26.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 28.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.7s Calculated | 9.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 353hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb Calculated | 320hp/t238kW/t145hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 406Nm/t271lb-ft/ton Calculated | 328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,087mm200in | 5,028mm198in |
| Width | - | 1,966mm77in |
| Height | 1,419mm56in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,054mm120in | 3,005mm118in |
| Front track | 1,716mm68in | 1,698mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,684mm66in | 1,710mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | 142mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 616L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,128L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Polestar5112 kWh | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.7 s | 9.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 9.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 219 km/h 136 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 884 hp 659 kW |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 789 hp 588 kW |
Polestar 5 112 kWh has 95 hp more than Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 95 hp (71 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 1,015 Nm 749 lb-ft |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 810 Nm 597 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 2,503 kg 5,518 lb |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 2,468 kg 5,441 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 3.2 s |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 3.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 5 112 kWh and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 353 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 320 hp/t 238 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 884 hp 659 kW | 3.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 789 hp 588 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Polestar5112 kWh | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 884 hp 659 kW | 789 hp 588 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,015 Nm 749 lb-ft | 810 Nm 597 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,503 kg 5,518 lb | 2,468 kg 5,441 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 353 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 320 hp/t 238 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Has 95 hp more
- Has 205 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 251 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Polestar 5 112 kWh
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsPolestar5112 kWh
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020Competition 4.4 V8
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)Facelift 2026S 680 V8
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80 LCI)Facelift 2024Competition 3.0
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)S 680 V12
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
Polestar5112 kWhvsAUDIRS3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 20242.5 TFSI
Polestar5112 kWhvsTeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Performance 79 kWh