Polestar 5
Car comparison
Polestar 5 112 kWhvsBMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (F90)
Competition 4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8
- Lightest1,865 kg4,112 lb
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful884 hp659 kW
- Highest torque1,015 Nm749 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight353 hp/t263 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Polestar5112 kWh | BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 884hp659kW | 625hp466kW |
| Torque | 1,015Nm749lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,503kg5,518lb | 1,865kg4,112lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 26.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 39.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 3.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.8s Calculated | 10.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 3.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 353hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb Calculated | 335hp/t250kW/t152hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 406Nm/t271lb-ft/ton Calculated | 402Nm/t269lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 630km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 5,087mm200in | 4,966mm196in |
| Width | 2,015mm79in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,419mm56in | 1,469mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,054mm120in | 2,982mm117in |
| Front track | 1,716mm68in | 1,625mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,684mm66in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | 128mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,128L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 246g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Polestar5112 kWh | BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.8 s | 10.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 4.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 135 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 884 hp 659 kW |
| BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 | 625 hp 466 kW |
Polestar 5 112 kWh has 259 hp more than BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8 and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 259 hp (193 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 1,015 Nm 749 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 2,503 kg 5,518 lb |
| BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 3.2 s |
| BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 | 3.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 5 112 kWh and BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 353 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 | 335 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 884 hp 659 kW | 3.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 | 625 hp 466 kW | 3.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Polestar5112 kWh | BMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 884 hp 659 kW | 625 hp 466 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,015 Nm 749 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,503 kg 5,518 lb | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 630 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 246 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 353 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 335 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Has 259 hp more
- Has 265 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M5 (F90) Competition 4.4 V8
- Is 638 kg lighter
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























