Car comparison

BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0vsLynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M3 (G80)

CS 3.0

550 hp2993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-2024
VS

Lynk & Co Z10

95 kWh

789 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    302 km/h
    188 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,765 kg
    3,891 lb
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    90/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

  • Most powerful
    789 hp
    588 kW
  • Highest torque
    810 Nm
    597 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    320 hp/t
    238 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    616 L
  • Best practicality score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
550hp410kW
789hp588kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
810Nm597lb-ft
Curb weight
1,765kg3,891lb
2,468kg5,441lb
Gross weight
2,245kg4,949lb
2,888kg6,367lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
28.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
3.5s
0-200 km/h
11.1s
9.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.2s
Calculated
3.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
11.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb
Calculated
320hp/t238kW/t145hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton
Calculated
328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
567km353mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
-
Length
4,795mm189in
5,028mm198in
Width
1,918mm76in
1,966mm77in
Height
1,438mm57in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,857mm112in
3,005mm118in
Front track
1,623mm64in
1,698mm67in
Rear track
1,605mm63in
1,710mm67in
Ground clearance
123mm5in
142mm6in
Trunk volume
480L
616L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
59L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.2 s
3.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
3.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.1 s
9.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
7.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.5 s
9.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
11.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
202 km/h
125 mph
214 km/h
133 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
550 hp
410 kW
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
789 hp
588 kW

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has 239 hp more than BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 239 hp (178 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
810 Nm
597 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
1,765 kg
3,891 lb
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
2,468 kg
5,441 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.03.4 s
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh3.5 s

Although Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has more power, BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
312 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
320 hp/t
238 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
550 hp
410 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
789 hp
588 kW
3.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,795 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
789 hp
588 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
550 hp
410 kW
789 hp
588 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
810 Nm
597 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,765 kg
3,891 lb
2,468 kg
5,441 lb
Fuel consumption
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,795 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
567 km
353 mi
-
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
312 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
320 hp/t
238 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
Consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.29 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,730 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0

  • Is 703 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

  • Has 239 hp more
  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 136 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 (G80 LCI)Facelift 2024Competition 3.0
95 kWh
112 kWh
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsPolestar5112 kWh
CS 3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
95 kWh
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 Touring (G81)Competition 3.0
95 kWh
M70 105.7 kWh
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
CS 3.0
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8
95 kWh
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020Competition 4.4 V8
CS 3.0
3.2
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 (E36)3.2
95 kWh
S 680 V12
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)S 680 V12
CS 3.0
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8
CS 3.0
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 vs Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster