Volvo S90
Car comparison
Volvo S90 2.0 T4vsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03
2.0TD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best estimated range821 km510 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS902.0 T4 | Lynk & Co032.0TD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,831kg4,037lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 55.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 44.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,963mm195in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,472mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS902.0 T4 | Lynk & Co032.0TD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 44.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 8.7 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Volvo S90 2.0 T4: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 821 km 510 mi |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS902.0 T4 | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS902.0 T4 | Lynk & Co032.0TD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S90 2.0 T4 | Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S90 2.0 T4
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
- Has 86 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
- Is 261 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























