Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200vsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)

E 200

197 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2020
VS

Lynk & Co 03

2.0TD

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200

  • Fastest top speed
    232 km/h
    144 mph
  • Most powerful
    197 hp
    147 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lightest
    1,570 kg
    3,461 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    769 km
    478 mi
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
197hp147kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,679kg3,702lb
1,570kg3,461lb
Gross weight
2,414kg5,322lb
-
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
70.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
55.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
28.9s
Calculated
44.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
694km432mi
Calculated
769km478mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,923mm194in
4,657mm183in
Width
1,852mm73in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,468mm58in
1,472mm58in
Wheelbase
2,939mm116in
2,730mm107in
Front track-
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,619mm64in
1,597mm63in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
540L
414L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200Lynk & Co 03 2.0TDPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 2005,500 rpm1,650-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
Lynk & Co032.0TD4,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200Lynk & Co032.0TD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.9 s
44.0 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
197 hp
147 kW
Lynk & Co032.0TD
190 hp
142 kW

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 has 7 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Lynk & Co032.0TD
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
1,679 kg
3,702 lb
Lynk & Co032.0TD
1,570 kg
3,461 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
232 km/h
144 mph
Lynk & Co032.0TD
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 2007.6 s
Lynk & Co032.0TD7.3 s

Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 has more power, Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Lynk & Co032.0TD
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
694 km
432 mi
Lynk & Co032.0TD
769 km
478 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
197 hp
147 kW
7.6 s
232 km/h
144 mph
Lynk & Co032.0TD
190 hp
142 kW
7.3 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,923 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.6 s
Lynk & Co032.0TD
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
197 hp
147 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.3 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,679 kg
3,702 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,923 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in
Range score
694 km
432 mi
769 km
478 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 126 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD

  • Is 109 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 75 km (46 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d
2.0TD
2.2 MultiJet
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)2.2 MultiJet
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 220d
2.0TD
2.0 TDI
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
E 200
E 250 BlueTEC
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 BlueTEC
2.0TD
A 220
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200
2.0TD
320i
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320i
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)Facelift 2020E 200
2.0TD
C 220d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
E 200
E 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250d
E 200
E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 vs Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD - car comparison - FastVsFaster