Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 220dvsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03
2.0TD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful194 hp145 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | Lynk & Co032.0TD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 194hp145kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | - |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.3s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 55.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 44.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 745km463mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,472mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | - | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 3,050 rpm |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | Lynk & Co032.0TD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 44.0 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 194 hp 145 kW |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d has 4 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 6.9 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d and Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d and Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 745 km 463 mi |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 194 hp 145 kW | 6.9 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d | Lynk & Co032.0TD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 194 hp 145 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 745 km 463 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d | Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 220d
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























