Lynk & Co 03
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD · Stage 3vsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD · Stage 2vsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD · Stage 1vsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03
2.0TD (Stage 2)
Lynk & Co 03
2.0TD (Stage 1)
Lynk & Co 03
2.0TD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Largest trunk414 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285hp213kW+95 hp | 247hp184kW+57 hp | 224hp167kW+34 hp | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft+165 Nm | 405Nm299lb-ft+105 Nm | 366Nm270lb-ft+66 Nm | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.3s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph-1.8 s Calculated | 57.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph+2.2 s Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph-0.2 s Calculated | 55.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s-1.6 s | 6.2s-1.1 s | 6.6s-0.7 s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s-26.4 s Calculated | 20.6s-23.4 s Calculated | 26.0s-18.0 s Calculated | 44.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 6.3s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s-1.7 s Calculated | 14.2s-1.1 s Calculated | 14.6s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 4,657mm183in | 4,657mm183in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,840mm72in | 1,840mm72in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,472mm58in | 1,472mm58in | 1,472mm58in | 1,472mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 147mm6in | 147mm6in | 147mm6in | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 414L | 414L | 414L | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 2) 247 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 1) 224 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD 190 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 20.6 s | 26.0 s | 44.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.0 s | 12.4 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.2 s | 14.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 247 hp 184 kW |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 224 hp 167 kW |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp has 95 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD 190 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD 190 hp and Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp: 95 hp (71 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 5.7 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 6.2 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 6.6 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp and Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD 190 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 2) 247 hp and Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 1) 224 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 182 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 769 km 478 mi |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 769 km 478 mi |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 769 km 478 mi |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | 182 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 3)285 hp | Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 2)247 hp | Lynk & Co032.0TD (Stage 1)224 hp | Lynk & Co032.0TD190 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285 hp 213 kW | 247 hp 184 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft | 366 Nm 270 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 769 km 478 mi | 769 km 478 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp | Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 2) 247 hp | Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 1) 224 hp | Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD 190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 3) 285 hp
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD (Stage 2) 247 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























