Tesla Model 3
Car comparison
Tesla Model 3 55 kWhvsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03
2.0TD
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model 3 55 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted209 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel 355 kWh | Lynk & Co032.0TD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | - | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 55.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 44.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,694mm185in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,472mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,875mm113in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel 355 kWh | Lynk & Co032.0TD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 44.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel 355 kWh | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 190 hp 142 kW |
Tesla Model 3 55 kWh has 14 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Tesla Model 3 55 kWh: 14 hp (10 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel 355 kWh | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel 355 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel 355 kWh | 5.9 s |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 55 kWh and Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel 355 kWh | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel 355 kWh | 204 hp 152 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
| Lynk & Co032.0TD | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel 355 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co032.0TD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel 355 kWh | Lynk & Co032.0TD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model 3 55 kWh
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
- Is 115 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























