Lotus Evora GT410 Sport
Car comparison
Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6vsPorsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Cayman (982)
GTS 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range667 km414 mi
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score81/100
Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful410 hp306 kW
- Lightest1,368 kg3,016 lb
- Best power-to-weight300 hp/t223 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410hp306kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,368kg3,016lb | 1,435kg3,164lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 13.7s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 300hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 545km339mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,995cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | 4,405mm173in |
| Width | 1,972mm78in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,223mm48in | 1,276mm50in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,527mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 270L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,000-7,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 7,000 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 13.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6 has 10 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 and Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 288 km/h 179 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 4.1 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 4.0 s |
Although Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6 has more power, Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 and Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 and Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 300 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 545 km 339 mi |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.0 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | 300 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 410 hp 306 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 545 km 339 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 300 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6 | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora GT410 Sport 3.5 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 67 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 121 km (75 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























