Porsche 718 Spyder (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0vsPorsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Cayman (982)
GTS 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Lightest1,435 kg3,164 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range667 km414 mi
- Largest trunk270 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score36/100
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight290 hp/t216 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,435kg3,164lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.4s | 13.7s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,995cc244cu in | 3,995cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,430mm174in | 4,405mm173in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,258mm50in | 1,276mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,484mm98in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,527mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 120L | 270L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 7,600 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 7,000 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.4 s | 13.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 has 20 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 and Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 288 km/h 179 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 3.9 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 and Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 627 km 390 mi |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 420 hp 313 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.0 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























