Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0vsPorsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Cayman (982)
GTS 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range753 km468 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lightest1,435 kg3,164 lb
- Best power-to-weight279 hp/t208 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk270 L
- Best performance score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,435kg3,164lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 13.7s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 3,995cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,405mm173in |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,276mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,527mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | 270L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 7,000 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 13.7 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 has 30 hp more than Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 288 km/h 179 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.2 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 and Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 753 km 468 mi |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.2 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.0 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 86 km (54 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























