Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8vsPorsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Cayman (982)
GTS 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range667 km414 mi
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score81/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Best power-to-weight287 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,435kg3,164lb |
| Gross weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.1s Calculated | 13.7s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 313Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 524km326mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 3,995cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,438mm175in | 4,405mm173in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,266mm50in | 1,276mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,484mm98in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,527mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 270L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 238g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 7,400 rpm | 4,750-6,000 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 7,000 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,800 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.1 s | 13.7 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 has 15 hp more than Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 288 km/h 179 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 4.4 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 524 km 326 mi |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.4 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.0 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 288 km/h 179 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 524 km 326 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 238 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8 | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 155 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 142 km (88 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























