Lotus Elise (SERIES 3)
Car comparison
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8vsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest924 kg2,037 lb
- Best power-to-weight238 hp/t178 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 924kg2,037lb | 1,185kg2,612lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 43.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 238hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 533km331mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,824mm151in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,719mm68in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,117mm44in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | - | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 240L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 173g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8 has 36 hp more than Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 924 kg 2,037 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 4.6 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8 and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 2.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 533 km 331 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW | 4.6 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusElise (SERIES 3)S 1.8 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 924 kg 2,037 lb | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 533 km 331 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 173 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8 | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) S 1.8
- Has 36 hp more
- Is 261 kg lighter
- Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 83 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 300 km (186 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 34 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























