Lincoln Z
Car comparison
Lincoln Z 2.0T · Stage 3vsLincoln Z 2.0T · Stage 1vsLincoln Z 2.0T · Stage 2vsLincoln Z 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLincoln Z
2.0T (Stage 1)
Lincoln Z
2.0T (Stage 2)
Lincoln Z
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 3) 392 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful392 hp292 kW
- Highest torque609 Nm449 lb-ft
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight239 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range917 km570 mi
- Largest trunk489 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | LincolnZ2.0T261 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 392hp292kW+131 hp | 308hp230kW+47 hp | 339hp253kW+78 hp | 261hp195kW |
| Torque | 609Nm449lb-ft+216 Nm | 479Nm354lb-ft+86 Nm | 531Nm391lb-ft+138 Nm | 393Nm290lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.5s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph-13.2 s Calculated | 58.6s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph-2.1 s Calculated | 51.7s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph-9.0 s Calculated | 60.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s-1.6 s | 6.3s-0.7 s | 5.9s-1.0 s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s-8.6 s Calculated | 19.5s-5.2 s Calculated | 18.8s-5.9 s Calculated | 24.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s-1.5 s Calculated | 6.0s-0.6 s Calculated | 5.7s-1.0 s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s-1.6 s Calculated | 14.2s-0.7 s Calculated | 13.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 239hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 208hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 373Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 917km570mi Calculated | 917km570mi Calculated | 917km570mi Calculated | 917km570mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,982mm196in | 4,982mm196in | 4,982mm196in | 4,982mm196in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,930mm115in | 2,930mm115in | 2,930mm115in | 2,930mm115in |
| Trunk volume | 489L | 489L | 489L | 489L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L | 66L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 3) 392 hp: Power / Torque
- Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 1) 308 hp: Power / Torque
- Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 2) 339 hp: Power / Torque
- Lincoln Z 2.0T 261 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | LincolnZ2.0T261 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.0 s | 5.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.3 s | 5.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 19.5 s | 18.8 s | 24.7 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.5 s | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.5 s | 9.3 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 12.1 s | 11.8 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 14.2 s | 13.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 392 hp 292 kW |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 308 hp 230 kW |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 339 hp 253 kW |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 261 hp 195 kW |
Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 3) 392 hp has 131 hp more than Lincoln Z 2.0T 261 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Lincoln Z 2.0T 261 hp and Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 3) 392 hp: 131 hp (97 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 609 Nm 449 lb-ft |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 479 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 531 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 5.4 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 6.3 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 5.9 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 3) 392 hp and Lincoln Z 2.0T 261 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 2) 339 hp and Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 1) 308 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 239 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 917 km 570 mi |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 917 km 570 mi |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 917 km 570 mi |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 917 km 570 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 392 hp 292 kW | 5.4 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 308 hp 230 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 339 hp 253 kW | 5.9 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 261 hp 195 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 3) 392 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | 239 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 3)392 hp | LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 1)308 hp | LincolnZ2.0T (Stage 2)339 hp | LincolnZ2.0T261 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 392 hp 292 kW | 308 hp 230 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | 261 hp 195 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 609 Nm 449 lb-ft | 479 Nm 354 lb-ft | 531 Nm 391 lb-ft | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.3 s | 5.9 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 917 km 570 mi | 917 km 570 mi | 917 km 570 mi | 917 km 570 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 489 L 17.3 cu ft | 489 L 17.3 cu ft | 489 L 17.3 cu ft | 489 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 239 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 3) 392 hp | Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 1) 308 hp | Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 2) 339 hp | Lincoln Z 2.0T 261 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 3) 392 hp
- Has 84 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Lincoln Z 2.0T (Stage 1) 308 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























