Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsLincoln Z 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLincoln Z
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Most powerful261 hp195 kW
- Highest torque393 Nm290 lb-ft
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk489 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | LincolnZ2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 261hp195kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 393Nm290lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 60.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 24.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 917km570mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 4,982mm196in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,930mm115in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 459L | 489L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Lincoln Z 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | LincolnZ2.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 24.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 261 hp 195 kW |
Lincoln Z 2.0T has 11 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Lincoln Z 2.0T: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 7.0 s |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lincoln Z 2.0T and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| LincolnZ2.0T | 261 hp 195 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LincolnZ2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | LincolnZ2.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 261 hp 195 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 393 Nm 290 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 917 km 570 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | 489 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lincoln Z 2.0T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Lincoln Z 2.0T
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 28 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























