Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8vsLexus RC F 5.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)

4.0 V8

462 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2015-2017
VS

Lexus RC

F 5.0

477 hp4969 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    304 km/h
    189 mph
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,615 kg
    3,560 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    286 hp/t
    213 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.2 L/100 km
    19.3 mpg US
    23.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    216 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    699 km
    434 mi
  • Best performance score
    86/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Lexus RC F 5.0

  • Most powerful
    477 hp
    356 kW
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8LexusRCF 5.0
Power
462hp345kW
477hp356kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
530Nm391lb-ft
Curb weight
1,615kg3,560lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.2s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph
Calculated
65.5s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
11.9s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.8s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
699km434mi
Calculated
611km380mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
4,969cc303cu in
Length
4,546mm179in
4,705mm185in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,845mm73in
Height
1,288mm51in
1,390mm55in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,555mm61in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,560mm61in
Ground clearance
98mm4in
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
65L
66L
CO2 emissions
216g/km
251g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8Lexus RC F 5.0PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Lexus RC F 5.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V86,000 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
LexusRCF 5.06,400-7,100 rpm4,800-5,600 rpm7,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8LexusRCF 5.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.9 s
14.4 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.0 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.8 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
200 km/h
124 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
462 hp
345 kW
LexusRCF 5.0
477 hp
356 kW

Lexus RC F 5.0 has 15 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Lexus RC F 5.0: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
LexusRCF 5.0
530 Nm
391 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
LexusRCF 5.0
1,860 kg
4,101 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
304 km/h
189 mph
LexusRCF 5.0
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V84.0 s
LexusRCF 5.04.5 s

Although Lexus RC F 5.0 has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Lexus RC F 5.0: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
LexusRCF 5.0
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Lexus RC F 5.0: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
LexusRCF 5.0
256 hp/t
191 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
699 km
434 mi
LexusRCF 5.0
611 km
380 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
462 hp
345 kW
4.0 s
304 km/h
189 mph
LexusRCF 5.0
477 hp
356 kW
4.5 s
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
Power
462 hp
345 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
LexusRCF 5.0
Power
477 hp
356 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,705 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
Power
462 hp
345 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
LexusRCF 5.0
Power
477 hp
356 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
4.0 s
LexusRCF 5.0
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
LexusRCF 5.0
256 hp/t
191 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8LexusRCF 5.0
Power
462 hp
345 kW
477 hp
356 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
4.5 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Lightness
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
1,860 kg
4,101 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
10.8 L/100 km
21.8 mpg US
26.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,705 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Range score
699 km
434 mi
611 km
380 mi
CO2 score
216 g/km
251 g/km
Power-to-weight score
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
256 hp/t
191 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8Lexus RC F 5.0
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km18.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi30.42 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year2,835 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 245 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 88 km (55 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 35 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Lexus RC F 5.0

  • Has 15 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
Lexus RC F 5.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8
F 5.0
300
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsLexusRCFacelift 2018300
4.0 V8
55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
F 5.0
500 V8
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsLexusLC500 V8
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8
F 5.0
AMG C 63 V8
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8
F 5.0
S 500
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)S 500
F 5.0
MC Stradale 4.7 V8
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsMaseratiGranTurismo IMC Stradale 4.7 V8
4.0 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
F 5.0
6.2 V8
VS
LexusRCF 5.0vsChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
4.0 V8
AMG GLC 63
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
4.0 V8
GLE 500
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C292)GLE 500
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 vs Lexus RC F 5.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster