Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)

4.0 V8

462 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2015-2017
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253)

AMG GLC 63

476 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2017-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    304 km/h
    189 mph
  • Lightest
    1,615 kg
    3,560 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    286 hp/t
    213 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.2 L/100 km
    19.3 mpg US
    23.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    216 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    699 km
    434 mi
  • Best performance score
    86/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Power
462hp345kW
476hp355kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
1,615kg3,560lb
1,935kg4,266lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
2,590kg5,710lb
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.2s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph
Calculated
53.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
4.0s
0-200 km/h
11.9s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
3.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.8s
Calculated
12.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
246hp/t183kW/t112hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
699km434mi
Calculated
617km383mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
4,546mm179in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,939mm76in
-
Height
1,288mm51in
1,578mm62in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,873mm113in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,684mm66in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,669mm66in
Ground clearance
98mm4in
-
Doors
2
4
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
65L
66L
CO2 emissions
216g/km
244g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V86,000 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 635,500-6,250 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
3.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
4.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.9 s
13.8 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
7.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.8 s
12.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
200 km/h
124 mph
189 km/h
117 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
462 hp
345 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
476 hp
355 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
650 Nm
479 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
1,935 kg
4,266 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
304 km/h
189 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
699 km
434 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
617 km
383 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
462 hp
345 kW
4.0 s
304 km/h
189 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
476 hp
355 kW
4.0 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
Power
462 hp
345 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,578 mm
62.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
Power
462 hp
345 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
4.0 s
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
4.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Power
462 hp
345 kW
476 hp
355 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
4.0 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
1,935 kg
4,266 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,578 mm
62.1 in
Range score
699 km
434 mi
617 km
383 mi
CO2 score
216 g/km
244 g/km
Power-to-weight score
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km18.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi30.13 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year2,809 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8

  • Is 320 kg lighter
  • Has 39 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 28 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 - car comparison - FastVsFaster