Chevrolet Camaro VI
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8vsLexus RC F 5.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus RC
F 5.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Highest torque617 Nm455 lb-ft
- Lightest1,659 kg3,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight273 hp/t204 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range649 km403 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Lexus RC F 5.0
- Most powerful477 hp356 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.1 L/100 km14.6 mpg US17.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions251 g/km
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | LexusRCF 5.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 453hp338kW | 477hp356kW |
| Torque | 617Nm455lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,659kg3,657lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 65.0s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 611km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 4,969cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,705mm185in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,560mm61in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 252g/km | 251g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Lexus RC F 5.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 6,400-7,100 rpm | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | LexusRCF 5.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 477 hp 356 kW |
Lexus RC F 5.0 has 24 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 and Lexus RC F 5.0: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 4.4 s |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 4.5 s |
Although Lexus RC F 5.0 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 and Lexus RC F 5.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 649 km 403 mi |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 611 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 477 hp 356 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusRCF 5.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusRCF 5.0 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| LexusRCF 5.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | LexusRCF 5.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 453 hp 338 kW | 477 hp 356 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 611 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 252 g/km | 251 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 | Lexus RC F 5.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
- Has 87 Nm more
- Is 201 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 km (23 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lexus RC F 5.0
- Has 24 hp more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























