Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsLexus LX III · Facelift 2015 570 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015

570 V8

367 hp5663 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Lightest
    2,146 kg
    4,731 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    192 g/km
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8

  • Most powerful
    367 hp
    274 kW
  • Highest torque
    530 Nm
    391 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    958 km
    595 mi
  • Largest trunk
    701 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best practicality score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Power
310hp231kW
367hp274kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
530Nm391lb-ft
Curb weight
2,146kg4,731lb
2,740kg6,041lb
Gross weight-
3,350kg7,385lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
109.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
30.2s
Calculated
38.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
855km532mi
Calculated
958km595mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
5,663cc346cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
5,065mm199in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,980mm78in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,910mm75in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,850mm112in
Front track
1,673mm66in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,635mm64in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
225mm9in
Trunk volume
314L
701L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
138L
CO2 emissions
192g/km
334g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V85,600 rpm3,200 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.2 s
38.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
367 hp
274 kW

Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has 57 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 57 hp (43 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
530 Nm
391 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
2,740 kg
6,041 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
230 km/h
143 mph
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V87.7 s

Although Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 6.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
855 km
532 mi
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
958 km
595 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
367 hp
274 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
701 L
24.8 cu ft
Length
5,065 mm
199.4 in
Height
1,910 mm
75.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.5 s
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
367 hp
274 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
2,740 kg
6,041 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
701 L
24.8 cu ft
Length
5,065 mm
199.4 in
Height
1,910 mm
75.2 in
Range score
855 km
532 mi
958 km
595 mi
CO2 score
192 g/km
334 g/km
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
701 L
24.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km25.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi40.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year3,780 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 594 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 142 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8

  • Has 57 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 387 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Lexus LX III 570 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
570 V8
300
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
570 V8
3.6
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsCadillacXT53.6
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
570 V8
GLS 400
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
2.0 T6
2.0 P300
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
570 V8
40i
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsBMWX7 (G07)40i
2.0 T6
3.0d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
570 V8
4.2 V8 FSI
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20144.2 V8 FSI
2.0 T6
30d V6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
570 V8
75D 75 kWh
VS
LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8vsTeslaModel X75D 75 kWh
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 vs Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015 570 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster