Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
2.0 P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range915 km568 mi
- Largest trunk810 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 249hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 81.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.6s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 915km568mi Calculated | 838km521mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,878mm192in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,904mm114in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 214mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 810L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 188g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.6 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 249 hp 186 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 has 1 hp more than Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 7.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 has more power, Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 915 km 568 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 838 km 521 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 249 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 249 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,955 kg 4,310 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 915 km 568 mi | 838 km 521 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 188 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























