Land Rover Range Rover Sport III
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8vsTesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model Y
Performance 80.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 534hp398kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 2,485kg5,478lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.1s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 35.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.4s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 720km447mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | - |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | - | 1,921mm76in |
| Height | 1,814mm71in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 2,890mm114in |
| Front track | 1,714mm67in | 1,646mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,723mm68in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 167mm7in |
| Trunk volume | - | 854L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,158L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.4 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 has 101 hp more than Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8: 101 hp (75 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 3.8 s |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 3.7 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 has more power, Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 534 hp 398 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 720 km 447 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 854 L 30.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8
- Has 101 hp more
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Is 490 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























