Lamborghini Urus
Car comparison
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
SV 4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful666 hp497 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Lightest2,197 kg4,844 lb
- Best power-to-weight303 hp/t226 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score90/100
- Best performance score90/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range720 km447 mi
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 666hp497kW | 635hp474kW |
| Torque | 850Nm627lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,197kg4,844lb | 2,485kg5,478lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.4s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 55.1s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s | 11.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 303hp/t226kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 603km375mi Calculated | 720km447mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 5,112mm201in | 4,970mm196in |
| Width | 2,018mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,638mm64in | 1,814mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 3,003mm118in | 2,998mm118in |
| Front track | 1,695mm67in | 1,714mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,710mm67in | 1,723mm68in |
| Trunk volume | 616L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,300-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 6,000-7,000 rpm | 1,800-5,855 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 11.4 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 666 hp 497 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW |
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 has 31 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 and Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 2,197 kg 4,844 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 3.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 and Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 603 km 375 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 720 km 447 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 666 hp 497 kW | 3.5 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 666 hp 497 kW | 635 hp 474 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,197 kg 4,844 lb | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 603 km 375 mi | 720 km 447 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.68 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,701 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8
- Has 31 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 288 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 117 km (73 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























