Land Rover Range Rover Sport III
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8vsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Lightest2,485 kg5,478 lb
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Highest torque950 Nm701 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 626hp467kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 950Nm701lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,485kg5,478lb | 2,615kg5,765lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,195kg7,044lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.1s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 33.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.4s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 239hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 720km447mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | - |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | - | 1,931mm76in |
| Height | 1,814mm71in | 1,672mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,714mm67in | 1,654mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,723mm68in | 1,659mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 184mm7in |
| Trunk volume | - | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.4 s | 14.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 626 hp 467 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 3.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 3.7 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 239 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 626 hp 467 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 626 hp 467 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 720 km 447 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 239 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 70 km/h (43 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























