Land Rover Range Rover Sport III
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
AMG GLS 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Lightest2,485 kg5,478 lb
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range750 km466 mi
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,485kg5,478lb | 2,555kg5,633lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 3,395kg7,485lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.1s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 51.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.4s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 720km447mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | - |
| Height | 1,814mm71in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,998mm118in | 3,135mm123in |
| Front track | 1,714mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,723mm68in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 6,000-7,000 rpm | 1,800-5,855 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 5,750-6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.4 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 126 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 has 23 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 2,555 kg 5,633 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 3.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 720 km 447 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIISV 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb | 2,555 kg 5,633 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 720 km 447 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III SV 4.4 V8
- Has 23 hp more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























