Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv G

284 hp3283 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport III

3.0 D300

301 hp2997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Fastest top speed
    219 km/h
    136 mph
  • Lightest
    1,949 kg
    4,297 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    477 L
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GLand RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
Power
284hp212kW
301hp224kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
1,949kg4,297lb
2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
3,220kg7,099lb
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
71.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
784km487mi
Calculated
988km614mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
2,997cc183cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,946mm195in
Width
1,890mm74in
-
Height
1,688mm66in
1,820mm72in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,997mm118in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,702mm67in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,704mm67in
Ground clearance
179mm7in
281mm11in
Trunk volume
477L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,860L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
80L
CO2 emissions
171g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300PowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G5,000-6,000 rpm2,000-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D3004,000 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GLand RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
34.7 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
301 hp
224 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 has 17 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
650 Nm
479 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
1,949 kg
4,297 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
2,315 kg
5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
219 km/h
136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
784 km
487 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
988 km
614 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW
6.9 s
219 km/h
136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
301 hp
224 kW
6.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
Power
301 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,946 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,820 mm
71.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
Power
301 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv GLand RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D300
Power
284 hp
212 kW
301 hp
224 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
6.6 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,949 kg
4,297 lb
2,315 kg
5,104 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,946 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,820 mm
71.7 in
Range score
784 km
487 mi
988 km
614 mi
CO2 score
171 g/km
-
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Is 366 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 27 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300

  • Has 17 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 204 km (127 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D300 - car comparison - FastVsFaster