Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

4.4 SDV8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2020
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Lightest
    2,146 kg
    4,731 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    192 g/km
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph Unrestricted
    225 km/h
    140 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    339 hp
    253 kW
  • Highest torque
    740 Nm
    546 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,024 km
    636 mi
  • Largest trunk
    780 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    64/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
339hp253kW
310hp231kW
Torque
740Nm546lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,443kg5,386lb
2,146kg4,731lb
Gross weight
3,200kg7,055lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
93.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
81.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
31.5s
Calculated
30.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,024km636mi
Calculated
855km532mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,367cc266cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,879mm192in
4,950mm195in
Width-
1,923mm76in
Height
1,803mm71in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,923mm115in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,693mm67in
1,673mm66in
Rear track
1,686mm66in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
278mm11in
238mm9in
Trunk volume
780L
314L
Max trunk volume
1,686L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
86L
71L
CO2 emissions
219g/km
192g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV83,500 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm3,750 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.5 s
30.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
339 hp
253 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 has 29 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
2,443 kg
5,386 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,146 kg
4,731 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV86.9 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
1,024 km
636 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
855 km
532 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.9 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
339 hp
253 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
2,443 kg
5,386 lb
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
780 L
27.5 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
1,024 km
636 mi
855 km
532 mi
CO2 score
219 g/km
192 g/km
Trunk score
780 L
27.5 cu ft
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

  • Has 29 hp more
  • Has 340 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 168 km (105 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 466 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 297 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 27 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 4.4 SDV8
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 SDV8
40i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsBMWX7 (G07)40i
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
4.4 SDV8
GLS 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
4.4 SDV8
3.0 TFSi V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsBentleyBentayga3.0 TFSi V6
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
4.4 SDV8
570 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
2.0 T6
2.0 P300
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 T6
3.0d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
4.4 SDV8
75D 75 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20174.4 SDV8vsTeslaModel X75D 75 kWh
2.0 T6
30d V6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster