Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

3.0 D250

249 hp2997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticSUV2020-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    2,151 kg
    4,742 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    314 L
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,117 km
    694 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
250hp186kW
249hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,151kg4,742lb
2,203kg4,857lb
Gross weight-
3,230kg7,121lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
93.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
103.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
47.5s
Calculated
52.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
877km545mi
Calculated
1,117km694mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,997cc183cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,923mm76in
-
Height
1,776mm70in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,673mm66in
1,692mm67in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
278mm11in
Trunk volume
314L
221L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
71L
86L
CO2 emissions
189g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D2504,000 rpm1,250-2,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.5 s
52.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
2,203 kg
4,857 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
215 km/h
134 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T57.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D2508.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
877 km
545 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
1,117 km
694 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.5 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
2,203 kg
4,857 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
877 km
545 mi
1,117 km
694 mi
CO2 score
189 g/km
-
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 52 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 93 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 3.0 D250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
3.0 D250
650T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
3.0 D250
40 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsAUDIQ640 TFSI
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
3.0 D250
2.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
3.0 D250
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
3.0 D250
380TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
3.0 D250
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 T5
550T
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsChevroletEquinox III550T
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster