Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250vsAUDI Q6 40 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q6
40 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted209 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest2,203 kg4,857 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,117 km694 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score86/100
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
- Largest trunk286 L
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 249hp186kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,203kg4,857lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Gross weight | 3,230kg7,121lb | 2,765kg6,096lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 114.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 104.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 56.0s Calculated | 52.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,117km694mi Calculated | 757km470mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,997cc183cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 5,099mm201in |
| Width | 2,073mm82in | 2,014mm79in |
| Height | 1,803mm71in | 1,784mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,923mm115in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,692mm67in | 1,704mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,686mm66in | 1,721mm68in |
| Ground clearance | 278mm11in | - |
| Trunk volume | 221L | 286L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,686L | 2,398L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 56.0 s | 52.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 has 18 hp more than AUDI Q6 40 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q6 40 TFSI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 2,203 kg 4,857 lb |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 8.5 s |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 1,117 km 694 mi |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 757 km 470 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ640 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ640 TFSI |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ640 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | AUDIQ640 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 249 hp 186 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,203 kg 4,857 lb | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,117 km 694 mi | 757 km 470 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 221 L 7.8 cu ft | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 | AUDI Q6 40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 16.19 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 26.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,388 L367 US gal305 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,428 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Is 2 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 360 km (224 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























