Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250vsAUDI Q6 40 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

3.0 D250

249 hp2997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticSUV2020-2022
VS

AUDI Q6

40 TFSI

231 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph Unrestricted
    209 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    249 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,203 kg
    4,857 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    113 hp/t
    84 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,117 km
    694 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250AUDIQ640 TFSI
Power
249hp186kW
231hp172kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
2,203kg4,857lb
2,205kg4,861lb
Gross weight
3,230kg7,121lb
2,765kg6,096lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
114.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
104.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
56.0s
Calculated
52.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,117km694mi
Calculated
757km470mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,997cc183cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,879mm192in
5,099mm201in
Width
2,073mm82in
2,014mm79in
Height
1,803mm71in
1,784mm70in
Wheelbase
2,923mm115in
2,980mm117in
Front track
1,692mm67in
1,704mm67in
Rear track
1,686mm66in
1,721mm68in
Ground clearance
278mm11in
-
Trunk volume
221L
286L
Max trunk volume
1,686L
2,398L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
6
Fuel tank
86L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250AUDIQ640 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
56.0 s
52.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW
AUDIQ640 TFSI
231 hp
172 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 has 18 hp more than AUDI Q6 40 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q6 40 TFSI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
AUDIQ640 TFSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
2,203 kg
4,857 lb
AUDIQ640 TFSI
2,205 kg
4,861 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
AUDIQ640 TFSI
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ640 TFSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and AUDI Q6 40 TFSI: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
AUDIQ640 TFSI
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
1,117 km
694 mi
AUDIQ640 TFSI
757 km
470 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
AUDIQ640 TFSI
231 hp
172 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
AUDIQ640 TFSI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
5,099 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,784 mm
70.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ640 TFSI
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.5 s
AUDIQ640 TFSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ640 TFSI
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250AUDIQ640 TFSI
Power
249 hp
186 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Lightness
2,203 kg
4,857 lb
2,205 kg
4,861 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
5,099 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,784 mm
70.2 in
Range score
1,117 km
694 mi
757 km
470 mi
Trunk score
221 L
7.8 cu ft
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km16.19 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi26.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,388 L367 US gal305 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,428 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 230 Nm more
  • Is 2 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 360 km (224 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q6 40 TFSI

  • Has 65 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 3.0 D250
AUDI Q6 40 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 vs AUDI Q6 40 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster