AUDI Q6
Car comparison
AUDI Q6 45 TFSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
3.0 D250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted207 km/h129 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk286 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest2,203 kg4,857 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,117 km694 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ645 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,203kg4,857lb |
| Gross weight | 2,780kg6,129lb | 3,230kg7,121lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 90.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 114.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.0s Calculated | 56.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 756km470mi Calculated | 1,117km694mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,099mm201in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 2,014mm79in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,784mm70in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,704mm67in | 1,692mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,721mm68in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 286L | 221L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,398L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ645 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.0 s | 56.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW |
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI has 16 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 2,203 kg 4,857 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 7.6 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q6 45 TFSI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 756 km 470 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 1,117 km 694 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ645 TFSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ645 TFSI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,280 kg 5,027 lb | 2,203 kg 4,857 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.4 mpg US 30.5 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 756 km 470 mi | 1,117 km 694 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | 221 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q6 45 TFSI | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.21 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.08 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,389 L367 US gal306 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,431 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 77 kg lighter
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 361 km (224 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























