Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

3.0 D250

249 hp2997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticSUV2020-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lightest
    2,136 kg
    4,709 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Largest trunk
    258 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
254hp189kW
249hp186kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,136kg4,709lb
2,203kg4,857lb
Gross weight
2,781kg6,131lb
3,230kg7,121lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
114.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
56.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,276km793mi
Calculated
1,117km694mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
2,997cc183cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,890mm74in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,692mm67in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
278mm11in
Trunk volume
258L
221L
Max trunk volume
1,971L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
7
Fuel tank
74L
86L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250PowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D2504,000 rpm1,250-2,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
56.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 5 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
2,203 kg
4,857 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D2508.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
1,117 km
694 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
254 hp
189 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
2,203 kg
4,857 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
1,276 km
793 mi
1,117 km
694 mi
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 67 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 37 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 3.0 D250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 D250
650T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsChevroletBlazer650T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
3.0 D250
40 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsAUDIQ640 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.0 D250
2.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsCadillacGT428T
3.0 D250
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
3.0 D250
380TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster