Volvo XC90 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV
3.0 SD V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions169 g/km
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Lightest2,078 kg4,581 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,078kg4,581lb | 2,394kg5,278lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 93.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 42.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 888km551mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,950mm195in | 4,999mm197in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,776mm70in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,679mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 238mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 368L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,886L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,200-5,400 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 42.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 292 hp 218 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 28 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 2,394 kg 5,278 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 888 km 551 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,078 kg 4,581 lb | 2,394 kg 5,278 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 888 km 551 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 368 L 13.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 | Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Has 28 hp more
- Is 316 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
- Has 200 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 363 km (225 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























