Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDIvsLand Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

3.0 TDI

286 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV

3.0 SD V6

292 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,870 kg
    4,123 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    153 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6

  • Most powerful
    292 hp
    218 kW
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDILand RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Power
286hp213kW
292hp218kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,870kg4,123lb
2,394kg5,278lb
Gross weight
2,550kg5,622lb
-
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
65.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
93.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
23.4s
Calculated
42.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton
Calculated
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,048km651mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,967cc181cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,659mm65in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,616mm64in
-
Rear track
1,609mm63in
-
Trunk volume
550L
-
Max trunk volume
1,510L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
80L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDILand Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6PowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI3,750-4,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V64,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDILand RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.4 s
42.5 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
292 hp
218 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 has 6 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
2,394 kg
5,278 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
237 km/h
147 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI5.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V66.9 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
1,048 km
651 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
5.8 s
237 km/h
147 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
292 hp
218 kW
6.9 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDILand RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6
Power
286 hp
213 kW
292 hp
218 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
6.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
2,394 kg
5,278 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
1,048 km
651 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
169 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDILand Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 524 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 7 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 202 km (125 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 TDI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
3.0 SD V6
3.0 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsMaseratiLevante3.0 V6
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6
3.0 SD V6
3.6 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
3.0 TDI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6
3.0 SD V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
3.0 TDI
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
3.0 SD V6
35i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsBMWX6 (F16)35i
3.0 TDI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
3.0 SD V6
3.0d V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
3.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDIvsAUDISQ22.0 TFSI
3.0 SD V6
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 3.0 TDI vs Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster