Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 3.6 V6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV
3.0 SD V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions169 g/km
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score90/100
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest2,040 kg4,497 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,394kg5,278lb |
| Gross weight | 2,810kg6,195lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 93.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.9s Calculated | 42.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 924km574mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,598cc220cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 4,999mm197in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | - |
| Trunk volume | 670L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 215g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.9 s | 42.5 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 292 hp 218 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 has 8 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 2,394 kg 5,278 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 7.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 6.9 s |
Although Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 924 km 574 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | 2,394 kg 5,278 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 924 km 574 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 215 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 | Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 354 kg lighter
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 326 km (203 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 46 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























