Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 3.0 diesel V6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV
3.0 SD V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions169 g/km
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.0 diesel V6
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Lightest2,110 kg4,652 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 262hp195kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,394kg5,278lb |
| Gross weight | 2,870kg6,327lb | - |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.9s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 93.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.9s Calculated | 42.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 4,999mm197in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | - |
| Trunk volume | 618L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,728L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.0 diesel V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.9 s | 42.5 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 262 hp 195 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 292 hp 218 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 has 30 hp more than Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.0 diesel V6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.0 diesel V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 2,394 kg 5,278 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 7.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.0 diesel V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 1,250 km 777 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 262 hp 195 kW | 7.3 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6 | Land RoverRange Rover IV3.0 SD V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 262 hp 195 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | 2,394 kg 5,278 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 618 L 21.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.0 diesel V6 | Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.0 diesel V6
- Is 284 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 SD V6
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























