Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

3.0 D250

249 hp2997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticSUV2020-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lightest
    1,950 kg
    4,299 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,094 km
    680 mi
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
254hp189kW
249hp186kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,950kg4,299lb
2,275kg5,016lb
Gross weight
2,516kg5,547lb
3,150kg6,945lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
119.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
35.1s
Calculated
58.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,094km680mi
Calculated
1,089km676mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
2,997cc183cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
5,000mm197in
Width
1,890mm74in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,687mm66in
1,869mm74in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
297mm12in
Trunk volume
477L
900L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
2,190L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
86L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLand Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250PowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D2504,000 rpm1,250-2,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.1 s
58.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 5 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
2,275 kg
5,016 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D7.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D2508.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,094 km
680 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
1,089 km
676 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
254 hp
189 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in
Range score
1,094 km
680 mi
1,089 km
676 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLand Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 325 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 D250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 D250
650T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsChevroletBlazer650T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.0 D250
2.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.0 D250
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
3.0 D250
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
3.0 D250
25t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsJaguarF-Pace25t
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
3.0 D250
380TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster