Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

3.0 D250

249 hp2997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticSUV2020-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,089 km
    676 mi
  • Largest trunk
    900 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    2,151 kg
    4,742 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
250hp186kW
249hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,151kg4,742lb
2,275kg5,016lb
Gross weight-
3,150kg6,945lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
93.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
119.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
47.5s
Calculated
58.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton
Calculated
264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
877km545mi
Calculated
1,089km676mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,997cc183cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
5,000mm197in
Width
1,923mm76in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,869mm74in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,673mm66in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
297mm12in
Trunk volume
314L
900L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
2,190L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
86L
CO2 emissions
189g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D2504,000 rpm1,250-2,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.5 s
58.0 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
2,275 kg
5,016 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
215 km/h
134 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T57.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D2508.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
877 km
545 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
1,089 km
676 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
249 hp
186 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,151 kg
4,742 lb
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in
Range score
877 km
545 mi
1,089 km
676 mi
CO2 score
189 g/km
-
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
109 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T5Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 124 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D250

  • Has 250 Nm more
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 212 km (132 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 586 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 D250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
3.0 D250
650T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsChevroletBlazer650T
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
3.0 D250
2.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
3.0 D250
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
3.0 D250
40 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsAUDIQ640 TFSI
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
3.0 D250
380TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D250vsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021380TSI
2.0 T5
550T
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsChevroletEquinox III550T
2.0 T5
GLS 350d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T5vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T5 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster