Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350dvsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166)

GLS 350d

258 hp2987 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015

2.0 Si4

240 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d

  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    258 hp
    192 kW
  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,316 km
    818 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350dLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
258hp192kW
240hp179kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
2,380kg5,247lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
3,250kg7,165lb
-
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
104.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
87.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
43.6s
Calculated
42.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,316km818mi
Calculated
897km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,987cc182cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
5,130mm202in
4,371mm172in
Width
1,934mm76in
1,985mm78in
Height
1,850mm73in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
3,075mm121in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,629mm64in
Trunk volume
680L
-
Max trunk volume
2,300L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
100L
70L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350dLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d3,400 rpm1,600-2,400 rpm3,650 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si45,800 rpm1,750 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350dLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.6 s
42.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d has 18 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
2,380 kg
5,247 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
222 km/h
138 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
1,316 km
818 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
897 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
258 hp
192 kW
7.8 s
222 km/h
138 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,850 mm
72.8 in
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
7.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350dLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
258 hp
192 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
2,380 kg
5,247 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
680 L
24.0 cu ft
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,850 mm
72.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
1,316 km
818 mi
897 km
558 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
680 L
24.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
108 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350dLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
Consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.30 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.40 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,995 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 280 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 418 km (260 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

  • Is 722 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 18 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster