Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350dvsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015
2.0 Si4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,316 km818 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,658 kg3,655 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions181 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 1,658kg3,655lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 104.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 87.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.6s Calculated | 42.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,316km818mi Calculated | 897km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,987cc182cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 4,371mm172in |
| Width | 1,934mm76in | 1,985mm78in |
| Height | 1,850mm73in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 3,075mm121in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,625mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,629mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 680L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,300L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 3,400 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 3,650 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 5,800 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.6 s | 42.4 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 258 hp 192 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d has 18 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 7.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 7.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 1,316 km 818 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 897 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 258 hp 192 kW | 7.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,316 km 818 mi | 897 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 280 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 418 km (260 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
- Is 722 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























