Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4vsLexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015

2.0 Si4

240 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Lexus NX I (AZ10)

200t

238 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

Fastest top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Most powerful
240 hp
179 kW
Lightest
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Best power-to-weight
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
181 g/km
Best estimated range
897 km
558 mi
Best overall score
62/100
Best economy score
86/100
Best practicality score
89/100

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.1 s
Highest torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Best performance score
51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power	240hp179kW	238hp177kW
Torque	340Nm251lb-ft	350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight	1,658kg3,655lb	1,810kg3,990lb
Gross weight	-	2,350kg5,181lb
Top speed	217 km/h 135 mph	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	86.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated	72.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.6s	7.1s
0-200 km/h	42.4s Calculated	44.4s Calculated
0-60 mph	7.2s Calculated	6.7s Calculated
Fuel consumption	7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK	7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK	10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK	6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.5s Calculated	15.2s Calculated
Power-to-weight	145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated	131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated	193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	897km558mi Calculated	759km472mi Calculated
Displacement	1,999cc122cu in	1,998cc122cu in
Length	4,371mm172in	4,630mm182in
Width	1,985mm78in	1,845mm73in
Height	1,660mm65in	1,645mm65in
Wheelbase	2,660mm105in	2,660mm105in
Front track	1,625mm64in	1,580mm62in
Rear track	1,629mm64in	1,580mm62in
Ground clearance	-	185mm7in
Trunk volume	-	555L
Max trunk volume	-	1,600L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	70L	60L
CO2 emissions	181g/km	183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200tPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	5,800 rpm	1,750 rpm	6,050 rpm
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	4,800 rpm	1,650 rpm	5,700 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	7.2 s	6.7 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.6 s	7.1 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	42.4 s	44.4 s
Top speed	217 km/h 135 mph	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.5 s	2.4 s
330 ft 101 m	6.6 s	6.5 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.1 s	9.8 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.0 s	12.7 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.5 s	15.2 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	146 km/h 91 mph	149 km/h 92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	240 hp 179 kW
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	238 hp 177 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has 2 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t.

The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	340 Nm 251 lb-ft
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	350 Nm 258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	1,658 kg 3,655 lb
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	1,810 kg 3,990 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	217 km/h 135 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	7.6 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	7.1 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has more power, Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	897 km 558 mi
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	759 km 472 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	240 hp 179 kW	7.6 s	217 km/h 135 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	238 hp 177 kW	7.1 s	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4

Power	240 hp 179 kW
0-100 km/h	7.6 s
Top speed 217 km/h 135 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,371 mm 172.1 in
Height	1,660 mm 65.4 in

LexusNX I (AZ10)200t

Power	238 hp 177 kW
0-100 km/h	7.1 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	555 L 19.6 cu ft
Length	4,630 mm 182.3 in
Height	1,645 mm 64.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4

Power	240 hp 179 kW
0-100 km/h	7.6 s
Top speed 217 km/h 135 mph

7.8 L/100 km

30.2 mpg US

36.2 mpg UK

LexusNX I (AZ10)200t

Power	238 hp 177 kW
0-100 km/h	7.1 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

7.9 L/100 km

29.8 mpg US

35.8 mpg UK

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK	7.6 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK	7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4	145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp	7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp	7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4

LexusNX I (AZ10)200t

Power

240 hp

179 kW

238 hp

177 kW

Torque

340 Nm

251 lb-ft

350 Nm

258 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.6 s

7.1 s

Top speed

217 km/h

135 mph

Unrestricted

210 km/h130 mph

Restricted

200 km/h124 mph

Lightness

1,658 kg

3,655 lb

1,810 kg

3,990 lb

Fuel consumption

7.8 L/100 km

30.2 mpg US

36.2 mpg UK

7.9 L/100 km

29.8 mpg US

35.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,371 mm 172.1 in
Height	1,660 mm 65.4 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	555 L 19.6 cu ft
Length	4,630 mm 182.3 in
Height	1,645 mm 64.8 in

Range score

897 km

558 mi

759 km

472 mi

CO2 score

181 g/km

183 g/km

Trunk score

555 L

19.6 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

145 hp/t

108 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

131 hp/t

98 kW/t

7.6 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4	Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Consumption	7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK	7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	13.65 LC100 km	13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	21.97 LC100 mi	22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal	1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,048 LC/year	2,074 LC/year