Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Discovery Sport

2.0 Si4

290 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    855 km
    532 mi
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

  • Lightest
    1,884 kg
    4,154 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    186 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    541 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
310hp231kW
290hp216kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,146kg4,731lb
1,884kg4,154lb
Gross weight-
2,505kg5,523lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
81.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
84.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
30.3s
Calculated
32.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
855km532mi
Calculated
835km519mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
4,599mm181in
Width
1,923mm76in
-
Height
1,776mm70in
1,724mm68in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,741mm108in
Front track
1,673mm66in
1,621mm64in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,630mm64in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
221mm9in
Trunk volume
314L
541L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
1,698L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
69L
CO2 emissions
192g/km
186g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si45,800 rpm1,500 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.3 s
32.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 20 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
1,884 kg
4,154 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si46.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
855 km
532 mi
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
835 km
519 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW
6.7 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
541 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.5 s
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
310 hp
231 kW
290 hp
216 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
1,884 kg
4,154 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
541 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in
Range score
855 km
532 mi
835 km
519 mi
CO2 score
192 g/km
186 g/km
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
541 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 20 km (12 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

  • Is 262 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 227 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0 Si4
3.0 TDI
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0 Si4
2.0t
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 Si4
2.0
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
2.0 T6
2.0 P300
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 T6
3.0d
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 Si4
50 TDI V6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
2.0 Si4
35i
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsBMWX6 (F16)35i
2.0 T6
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster