Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0tvsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport
2.0 Si4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions174 g/km
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score86/100
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Best estimated range835 km519 mi
- Largest trunk541 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace2.0t | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,884kg4,154lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,505kg5,523lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.7s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 818km508mi Calculated | 835km519mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,746mm187in | 4,599mm181in |
| Width | 2,070mm81in | - |
| Height | 1,667mm66in | 1,724mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,621mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 463L | 541L |
| Max trunk volume | 650L | 1,698L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 5,800 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace2.0t | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has 10 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 1,884 kg 4,154 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 818 km 508 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 835 km 519 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.0 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW | 6.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace2.0t | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,884 kg 4,154 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 818 km 508 mi | 835 km 519 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 463 L 16.4 cu ft | 541 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t | Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 114 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Has 78 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























