Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 1.5 P300evsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 1.5 P300e
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted209 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption2.0 L/100 km117.6 mpg US141.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range2,850 km1,771 mi
- Largest trunk1,179 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Lightest1,950 kg4,299 lb
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t75 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,093kg4,614lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.2s Calculated | 66.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 2L/100 km117.6mpg US141.2mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,850km1,771mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,497cc91cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,597mm181in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | - | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,727mm68in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,741mm108in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,636mm64in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 1,179L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,794L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 1.5 P300e: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,760 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.2 s | 66.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW |
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 1.5 P300e has 3 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 1.5 P300e: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 2,093 kg 4,614 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 6.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 1.5 P300e and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 1.5 P300e and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 2,850 km 1,771 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e |
| 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 1.5 P300e is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20191.5 P300e | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,093 kg 4,614 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 2.0 L/100 km 117.6 mpg US 141.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,850 km 1,771 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,179 L 41.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 1.5 P300e | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 2 L/100 km117.6 mpg US141.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 3.50 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 5.63 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 300 L79 US gal66 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 525.00 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 1.5 P300e
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,647 km (1,023 mi) more estimated range
- Has 674 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Is 143 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























