Car comparison

Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 MultijetvsRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lancia Delta III (844)

1.9 Multijet

190 hp1910 ccDieselFWDManualTwin-turboHatchback2008-2011
VS

Renault Clio III (PHASE I)

RS 2.0 16V

200 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2008-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet

  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,018 km
    632 mi
  • Largest trunk
    420 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
215Nm159lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
1,240kg2,734lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
86.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
69.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
38.6s
Calculated
36.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton
Calculated
173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,018km632mi
Calculated
618km384mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,910cc117cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,520mm178in
3,991mm157in
Width
1,797mm71in
1,768mm70in
Height
1,499mm59in
1,477mm58in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,585mm102in
Front track
1,538mm61in
1,520mm60in
Rear track
1,531mm60in
1,520mm60in
Trunk volume
420L
288L
Max trunk volume
1,190L
1,028L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
58L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 MultijetRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16VPowerTorque
  • Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V7,250 rpm5,500 rpm7,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.6 s
36.7 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
190 hp
142 kW
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
200 hp
149 kW

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V has 10 hp more than Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet.

The biggest power difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 Nm
159 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
1,240 kg
2,734 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
222 km/h
138 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet7.9 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
1,018 km
632 mi
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
618 km
384 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
222 km/h
138 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
200 hp
149 kW
6.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,499 mm
59.0 in
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
7.9 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 Multijet
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
215 Nm
159 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
6.9 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
Fuel consumption
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,499 mm
59.0 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Range score
1,018 km
632 mi
618 km
384 mi
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLancia Delta III (844) 1.9 MultijetRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.98 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.05 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used855 L226 US gal188 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,496 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet

  • Has 185 Nm more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 400 km (248 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 132 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 190 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.9 Multijet
1.9 MultiJet 16V
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetvsLanciaDelta III (844)Facelift 20111.9 MultiJet 16V
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
1.9 Multijet
A 200 Turbo
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetvsMercedes-BenzA-class (W169)Facelift 2008A 200 Turbo
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
1.9 Multijet
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
RS 2.0 16V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
1.9 Multijet
Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetvsAbarthGrande Punto (199)Esseesse 1.4 T-Jet
RS 2.0 16V
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
1.9 Multijet
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
1.9 Multijet
RC 1.6
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetvsPeugeot207Facelift 2009RC 1.6
1.9 Multijet
Cooper S 1.6
VS
LanciaDelta III (844)1.9 MultijetvsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.9 Multijet vs Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster